White organic light-emitting diodes: Status and perspective – published!

The above mentioned paper has finally shaped to its final form. White organic light-emitting diodes: Status and perspective has been published today in Reviews of Modern Physics (RMP). It contains more than 40 pages of densely packed details on white OLEDs including the main concepts of realizing white emission (from both polymers and/or small molecules), in depth discussions of respective efficiency limits, and promising strategies for enhanced light outcoupling. Here is an editorial summary (source RMP):

The conversion of electricity into a photon flux with color quality resembling natural sunlight is desirable for artificial illumination. The ubiquitous incandescent light bulb, introduced in 1880 by Thomas Edison, satisfies this color quality requirement but suffers from a rather poor energy conversion efficiency of approximately 5%. This review focuses on device strategies to produce efficient organic white light-emitting diodes based on small molecular and polymeric semiconductors, which in the context of next generation lighting have a considerable technological promise.

If you like it, please spread the word. Here is an exciting side note: This paper is published in the same issue of RMP that also contains the great Nobel lectures of Serge Haroche and David J. Wineland, who share the 2012 Nobel Prize for Physics. Another good reason to check out the current issue of RMP.


How do you want to work with scientific literature?

In science, we are driven to explore, understand, discover, and go beyond. But this is only possible because we base our everyday thinking on the known. Thus, over and over, we dig through scientific literature in the hope to find the right arguments, to get inspired, to learn with the hope to propel our own scientific work.

I know a couple of (former)students, who want to take the interaction/work with scientific literature to the next level (as far as I know through awesome, top notch coding). I am sure they have many great ideas, but they would like to get INPUT from the scientific community – the end user – first. So if there you feel triggered by the idea of having better tools for the work with papers, etc., you have the chance to provide your thoughts. They set up a survey for collecting ideas, learning current practice, and prioritize individual needs. Get involved! Your help is greatly appreciated (no iPads to win, but maybe the result rocks). Thanks.